Now maybe this vid is a load of rubbish for publicity, but if it isn't, then it shows the Spiritual Science Research Foundation is dangerous: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8E1a63NB2c
Why?
1. It shows people messing about with spirits. Negative spirits. Not exactly the most smart or most sane idea.
2. Most importantly: I don't believe the Christian Bible is the absolute word of God. However, I do believe it was inspired by God and all sorts of nonsense got added later. So in short, I believe some of it is true, and you can tell by either checking it against other sources [even within the bible you can check, for example, Matthew's version of an event with Luke's version and see if they are word-for-word (which means one likely copied the other), totally different (which means one is likely not telling the truth), or slightly different but with the same general gist (as would be the case if two witnesses were remembering an actual event)], or by seeing whether the words come true for certain.
'By their fruits ye shall know them' and 'For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.' Matthew 7:16 and Matthew 24:24.
Why would a person of God be messing with negative spirits? Why are these people calling themselves 'His Holiness'? And it fits the 'shall shew great signs and wonders' bit perfectly ('shew' is an old word with the same meaning as the word 'show').
Personally I think it's fake as the woman in the end of the video looks exhausted and a spirit would almost certainly not be - so if a spirit is controlling the woman, why would the woman be exhausted? But if it is fake, the organisation isn't exactly scrupulous is it?
Either way, I wouldn't go near it with a barge pole.
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
Friday, 27 August 2010
Textile (non-nudist) Teachers Charged With Child Porn Offences
Because people keep focussing on irrelevant things when a minority group gets charged with a crime (e.g. "Vegan father charged with assaulting kids" - what does his veganism have to do with it?; "Muslim charged with something that has nothing to do with him being a Muslim", etc.), I've decided to play the people who write stuff like that at their own game.
So I am reporting today on two textile primary school teachers ('textiles' is a non-aggressive name used by nudists to refer to non-nudists), who have been arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children.
The accused, both males, work at different primary schools - one, aged 43, teaches at St Patrick's School in Earlswood, Solihull, and the 37-year-old teaches at Monkspath School, in the Shirley area of Solihull.
A helpline has been set up to offer assistance and advice: 0121 704 8300.
So yet again, a textile is arrested for child porn offences. Doesn't this just go to show how disgusting and vile textiles are, and that clothed people should be banned from everywhere?! After all, with the majority of people who have committed a sexual crime against a child being textiles, how can we possibly trust these people, no matter how safe they insist their lifestyle choice is?!
It seems we should only ever let nudists near our children and make sure no clothed person is allowed anywhere near our kids. Only when these perverts are banned from society will we be safe!
You can see one of these clothed people here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/xdzombiez/4906261403/in/pool-60117213@N00 - WARNING! CONTAINS TEXTILE! Please note that as far as I know this person has never actually been arrested or charged with any crime whatsoever, nor ever came under any suspicion of one, and if you think she has then you have clearly missed the point of this article.
And here's a naked father and son sharing a bath together: http://comps.fotosearch.com/comp/JCE/JCE148/father-son-6-8_~8613.jpg
Which one of those pics looks most natural to you?!
So I am reporting today on two textile primary school teachers ('textiles' is a non-aggressive name used by nudists to refer to non-nudists), who have been arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children.
The accused, both males, work at different primary schools - one, aged 43, teaches at St Patrick's School in Earlswood, Solihull, and the 37-year-old teaches at Monkspath School, in the Shirley area of Solihull.
A helpline has been set up to offer assistance and advice: 0121 704 8300.
 |
| These people are wearing clothing so do they count as textiles? It is generally accepted that when someone's genitals are showing, they are not clothed, so you should be safe with these people. |
It seems we should only ever let nudists near our children and make sure no clothed person is allowed anywhere near our kids. Only when these perverts are banned from society will we be safe!
You can see one of these clothed people here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/xdzombiez/4906261403/in/pool-60117213@N00 - WARNING! CONTAINS TEXTILE! Please note that as far as I know this person has never actually been arrested or charged with any crime whatsoever, nor ever came under any suspicion of one, and if you think she has then you have clearly missed the point of this article.
And here's a naked father and son sharing a bath together: http://comps.fotosearch.com/comp/JCE/JCE148/father-son-6-8_~8613.jpg
Which one of those pics looks most natural to you?!
Wednesday, 25 August 2010
Welcome - and don't go to Tufts University or UVA, they don't care if you get raped
Welcome to my blog. This blog is about me and about stuff in the world.
I'm 27 and working on becoming a High Priest of Wicca. For any ignorant Americans (not saying all Americans are ignorant) reading this, that's not the same as Satanism no matter what a misguided preacher in your country tells you. I'm English and I'm a university graduate. And I'm male and a vegan (again, to ignorant people, no that doesn't mean I'm going to picket your house if you eat meat - to each their own).
I've been putting random crap into google as I often do, and in this instance I was seeing what would actually show if I put stuff like 'sex' etc. into google with the image filter on. Not much, and eventually I put in the word 'rape'. A few silly jokes, then this website: http://rapedattufts.info/.
It's a website with experiences that make it very clear that if you are raped, or are in any kind of abusive relationship (at least if you're female and the rapist/abuser is male), you'll get indifference and hostility from the university staff at Tufts University and even the university police.
So if you are female and planning on studying there (http://www.tufts.edu/) - please don't. If you've already applied and it's too late to apply elsewhere (I'm not sure how the univerity system works in the U.S.A.), remember it's better to wait a year and lower your risk of being raped (not saying it won't happen but why go to somewhere where it seems quite likely as the offenders know they won't be punished?) than to go to a university this year and get raped and not even get justice.
Another university to avoid for similar reasons is UVA (University of Virginia) - details at this link: http://www.uvavictimsofrape.com/. The UVA website is http://www.virginia.edu/ and I have put the university websites so you know which ones I'm talking about.
What the heck is it with U.S. universities? I can't remember the name of it but I think there was another one that I read about too - similar stuff. Seems they care more about their image than helping students - even though them not helping students will negatively affect their image.
Also remember that in the U.S.A., universities count as "schools", and U.S. courts have consistently made it clear that schools can blatantly ignore th U.S. constitution. I bet their ancestors would be outraged if still alive.
I'm 27 and working on becoming a High Priest of Wicca. For any ignorant Americans (not saying all Americans are ignorant) reading this, that's not the same as Satanism no matter what a misguided preacher in your country tells you. I'm English and I'm a university graduate. And I'm male and a vegan (again, to ignorant people, no that doesn't mean I'm going to picket your house if you eat meat - to each their own).
I've been putting random crap into google as I often do, and in this instance I was seeing what would actually show if I put stuff like 'sex' etc. into google with the image filter on. Not much, and eventually I put in the word 'rape'. A few silly jokes, then this website: http://rapedattufts.info/.
It's a website with experiences that make it very clear that if you are raped, or are in any kind of abusive relationship (at least if you're female and the rapist/abuser is male), you'll get indifference and hostility from the university staff at Tufts University and even the university police.
A "joke" poster that demonstrates the backwards view, prevalent at Tufts University and UVA, that if women wear comfortable clothing, they should "expect" to be raped, especially if they happen to joke around.
So if you are female and planning on studying there (http://www.tufts.edu/) - please don't. If you've already applied and it's too late to apply elsewhere (I'm not sure how the univerity system works in the U.S.A.), remember it's better to wait a year and lower your risk of being raped (not saying it won't happen but why go to somewhere where it seems quite likely as the offenders know they won't be punished?) than to go to a university this year and get raped and not even get justice.
Another university to avoid for similar reasons is UVA (University of Virginia) - details at this link: http://www.uvavictimsofrape.com/. The UVA website is http://www.virginia.edu/ and I have put the university websites so you know which ones I'm talking about.
What the heck is it with U.S. universities? I can't remember the name of it but I think there was another one that I read about too - similar stuff. Seems they care more about their image than helping students - even though them not helping students will negatively affect their image.
Also remember that in the U.S.A., universities count as "schools", and U.S. courts have consistently made it clear that schools can blatantly ignore th U.S. constitution. I bet their ancestors would be outraged if still alive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)