AVOID the JET Program ( Japan Exchange and Teaching Programme )

This isn't going to be a blog all about sexual attacks, but since this is important I'm posting it here.

http://www.zen13795.zen.co.uk/jetsurvey/Assault.htm

Sexual assault on the programme and the people who are supposed to help have not only done nothing about it, they've even bullied victims!

If you're already on the program, quit. You may get a massive bill for fees, but just ignore it. And I mean ignore it - don't respond to a single letter and if you get a phone call asking "is that [your name]?", ask "who's speaking?" and don't give your name until they tell you. If it's some debt collecter, tell them you're someone else ("I bought this mobile (cell phone) off some guy/girl", "I just moved into this house"). Sure it may mess up your credit rating, but what's better - bad credit rating or sexual abuse?

Is Google Tracking Us?

As if it wasn't enough that Google is invading privacy by taking photos of people in places that the public would not normally see (e.g. back gardens), the company now appears to be tracking internet use.

A bit of background info: On various webpages, Google adverts are displayed. These are usually put their by whoever runs the website, or whoever owns the website. The adverts display information based on what is written on an individual webpage. So if a webpage mentions dogs, adverts about dogs may appear. Ironically, if a vegetarian website mentions meat on one of its webpages, adverts for meat products may appear!

However, the adverts are always either based on one or more words on the page, or are non-profit or charity adverts (or rarely adverts about Google products).

Yet this happened: I searched for cat tracking devices on Google and looked at various websites. A lot later, I went onto a forum that had nothing to do with cats, and the specific page I was looking at had nothing about cats mentioned. Yet on the page was a very large advert for a cat tracking device.

The only reason for this has to be that Google is using some sort of tracking software to follow my internet locations (follow me to different websites), and then displaying adverts based on what I've previously searched for on Google. I've now deleted what I could from the Internt Options on my computer, but the fact that staff at Google are having a nosey at whatever websites you happen to visit is pretty fucking sinister.

PERVERTED AMERICAN OFFICIALS CAN GROPE YOUR KIDS

The paedophile who lets it happen (top left) and more paedos (bottom left).

Yep. You read that right. TSA (Transportation Security Administration) now have free reign to grope anyone who goes through a U.S. airport (update: and now train stations and bus stations too).

I'm not talking about the alread-perverted pat-downs. I'm talking about "enhanced pat downs". In other words, sexual assault - just like torture was given a new name of "enhanced interrogation" by the Bush administration.

Imagine, in order to "protect" you (supposedly), a TSA agent feels up your kid. Using the front of their hand, they poke, prod, and have a good feel. Well I hate the idea of being locked up in a foreign country, but if someone did that to my kid I'd punch them in the head until they were unconscious.

What's next, anal probes? People used to joke about that but I can seriously imagine that, maybe called "super enhanced pat downs". Americans need to wake the fuck up and do something about this, and the rest of the world needs to condemn, boycott, and impose sanctions on the U.S.A. until the government stops this happening (TSA agents work on behalf of the U.S. government).

There's a video about it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InM3Mzt1uU8

Media Keeps Lying About Pope - HE DID NOT APOLOGISE

This is a public domain image of an abuse facilitator, thus breaking no copyright laws. Even if the pope doesn't like the use of the image: in all but a few circumstances, under English law, it is the person who actually took the photograph who has the say in how it is used (unless it is taken in a private setting), including a say on how others may use the photograph. As for the 'abuse facilitator' stamp, I am exercising my right to freedom of expression under article 10 of the Human Rights Act; the Magna Carta of 1215; the later Magna Carta of 1297 - The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, andof the Liberties of the Forest; and in the long tradition of free speech as valued by the English people, and any interference with such rights as laid down by statute and common law is illegal, so the pope can go stick his head in a hot oven

Yet again, Joseph Ratzinger (the pope) has refused to apologise for the handling of the sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests and nuns, instead doing what politicians do - making it look like he is saying something that people want to hear, but actually using weasel words to absolutely avoid saying it.

And yet again, the media is claiming he apologised. The BBC, supposedly known for it's independence and unbiased reporting (rubbish!) has even stated on BBC Radio 5 (which has many listeners) "The pope has said sorry"!

Frankly the way the media is dealing with the pope's avoidance of an apology is a blatant attack on victims. This is because anyone who does not know what the pope actually said, but who has heard the bull from Radio 5, will be annoyed at the "way the victims are refusing to accept the pope's apology" - thus creating a state of affairs where people are actually angry at the victims of abuse - and all because of the BBC and other media outlets which clearly support the pope.

This is original artwork, not the official BBC logo (which incidentally looks crap anyway), therefore I am not breaking any copyright laws so the BBC executives can go stuff themselves. As for the 'liars' stamp, I am exercising my right to freedom of expression under article 10 of the Human Rights Act; the Magna Carta of 1215; the later Magna Carta of 1297 - The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, andof the Liberties of the Forest; and in the long tradition of free speech as valued by the English people, and any interference with such rights as laid down by statute and common law is illegal

If the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) had asked Prime Minister David Cameron: "Despite idiotic Daily Mail reports to the contrary that focus on a tiny minority of individuals who manage to cheat the system (and a few made-up individuals in order to sell the Daily Mail), it is a fact that people on Jobseeker's Allowance (a state benefit) get just £65 a week - this does not realistically meet the cost of living, therefore can you confirm that Jobseeker's Allowance will increase to a more acceptable level that takes into account the current cost of living?" and his response was "I really care for poor people. I can assure you that they are very important to me, and that there will be no reduction in Jobseeker's Allowance. We are currently looking at the current rate of payment and we want to protect the most vulnerable in society", the media would be all over him as he had clearly avoided actually saying what people wanted to hear - "yes, the amount will increase to a more acceptable level". The media, especially the BBC, would certainly not be going around claiming the PM had stated that Jobseeker's Allowance will be increased. Yet when the pope speaks in a similar way to avoid giving an apology, the media instead claims he has apologised.

This just goes to show that the Vatican still wields a lot of power. In fact if you do some basic "googling", you can find that it has a lot of shares around the world, and I'm willing to bet that those shares include the BBC, MSNBC, and other media outlets which are currently engaged in lies about the pope in order to make it look like he has apologised and the abuse victims are being unforgiving - lies made worse by the fact that Christianity, of which Catholicism is supposedly part (despite obvious ignorance of various biblical teachings), considers forgiveness to be important.

To be clear, the pope expressed sorrow. I feel sorrow at what has happened yet I had nothing to do with it, and I'm sure most people with a heart feel sorrow, so clearly that is not the same as an apology.

Ratzinger has consistently refused to utter the word 'sorry' and I want to know why. Considering the fact a number of priests (and no doubt many nuns) who were involved, either directly or indrectly, in the abuse scandal, are still serving members of the Catholic Church, I think I have my answer: he does not care a jot about the victims, and only cares about those who sexually abused children and those who facilitated the abuse.

One more thing: let's be clear about this. The media is engaging in 18th-century "it's not as bad when it's a woman" sexism. Nuns abused too and that abuse is no less traumatic for the victims*. He disgusts and sickens me, and so does our supposedly "independent" media.

*See http://www.snapnetwork.org/female_victims/complaints_abuse_by_nuns.htm for example.

Aliens and Maths and How to Give First Aid to a Cat

I've found a website (http://www.croad.jimdo.com/) -apparently also called The Croad Website- (and shows up in google if you google that name, about the fourth link down) and it has mad stuff on it as well as a load of useful stuff.

As just an example, it's got stuff about protecting yourself from aliens (the extra-terretrial kind) -WTF?- and stuff about Exorcisms and Spirit Release, but it's also got more sensible stuff like benefits information, homelessness stuff, games, first aid for some animals (none for humans strangely, except a choking page), maths stuff, helplines, and all sorts.

Needs a shorter web address (but then so does my blog!), but just google 'The Croad Website' and you should find it. And if you like it, there's a button on almost every page where you can share it!

WARNING about the Spiritual Science Research Foundation

Now maybe this vid is a load of rubbish for publicity, but if it isn't, then it shows the Spiritual Science Research Foundation is dangerous: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8E1a63NB2c

Why?
1. It shows people messing about with spirits. Negative spirits. Not exactly the most smart or most sane idea.
2. Most importantly: I don't believe the Christian Bible is the absolute word of God. However, I do believe it was inspired by God and all sorts of nonsense got added later. So in short, I believe some of it is true, and you can tell by either checking it against other sources [even within the bible you can check, for example, Matthew's version of an event with Luke's version and see if they are word-for-word (which means one likely copied the other), totally different (which means one is likely not telling the truth), or slightly different but with the same general gist (as would be the case if two witnesses were remembering an actual event)], or by seeing whether the words come true for certain.

'By their fruits ye shall know them' and 'For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.' Matthew 7:16 and Matthew 24:24.

Why would a person of God be messing with negative spirits? Why are these people calling themselves 'His Holiness'? And it fits the 'shall shew great signs and wonders' bit perfectly ('shew' is an old word with the same meaning as the word 'show').

Personally I think it's fake as the woman in the end of the video looks exhausted and a spirit would almost certainly not be - so if a spirit is controlling the woman, why would the woman be exhausted? But if it is fake, the organisation isn't exactly scrupulous is it?

Either way, I wouldn't go near it with a barge pole.

Textile (non-nudist) Teachers Charged With Child Porn Offences

Because people keep focussing on irrelevant things when a minority group gets charged with a crime (e.g. "Vegan father charged with assaulting kids" - what does his veganism have to do with it?; "Muslim charged with something that has nothing to do with him being a Muslim", etc.), I've decided to play the people who write stuff like that at their own game.

So I am reporting today on two textile primary school teachers ('textiles' is a non-aggressive name used by nudists to refer to non-nudists), who have been arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children.

The accused, both males, work at different primary schools - one, aged 43, teaches at St Patrick's School in Earlswood, Solihull, and the 37-year-old teaches at Monkspath School, in the Shirley area of Solihull.

A helpline has been set up to offer assistance and advice: 0121 704 8300.

These people are wearing clothing so do they count as textiles? It is generally accepted that when someone's genitals are showing, they are not clothed, so you should be safe with these people.

So yet again, a textile is arrested for child porn offences. Doesn't this just go to show how disgusting and vile textiles are, and that clothed people should be banned from everywhere?! After all, with the majority of people who have committed a sexual crime against a child being textiles, how can we possibly trust these people, no matter how safe they insist their lifestyle choice is?!

It seems we should only ever let nudists near our children and make sure no clothed person is allowed anywhere near our kids. Only when these perverts are banned from society will we be safe!

You can see one of these clothed people here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/xdzombiez/4906261403/in/pool-60117213@N00 - WARNING! CONTAINS TEXTILE! Please note that as far as I know this person has never actually been arrested or charged with any crime whatsoever, nor ever came under any suspicion of one, and if you think she has then you have clearly missed the point of this article.

And here's a naked father and son sharing a bath together: http://comps.fotosearch.com/comp/JCE/JCE148/father-son-6-8_~8613.jpg

Which one of those pics looks most natural to you?!

Welcome - and don't go to Tufts University or UVA, they don't care if you get raped

Welcome to my blog. This blog is about me and about stuff in the world.

I'm 27 and working on becoming a High Priest of Wicca. For any ignorant Americans (not saying all Americans are ignorant) reading this, that's not the same as Satanism no matter what a misguided preacher in your country tells you. I'm English and I'm a university graduate. And I'm male and a vegan (again, to ignorant people, no that doesn't mean I'm going to picket your house if you eat meat - to each their own).

I've been putting random crap into google as I often do, and in this instance I was seeing what would actually show if I put stuff like 'sex' etc. into google with the image filter on. Not much, and eventually I put in the word 'rape'. A few silly jokes, then this website: http://rapedattufts.info/.

It's a website with experiences that make it very clear that if you are raped, or are in any kind of abusive relationship (at least if you're female and the rapist/abuser is male), you'll get indifference and hostility from the university staff at Tufts University and even the university police.

A "joke" poster that demonstrates the backwards view, prevalent at Tufts University and UVA, that if women wear comfortable clothing, they should "expect" to be raped, especially if they happen to joke around.

So if you are female and planning on studying there (http://www.tufts.edu/)  - please don't. If you've already applied and it's too late to apply elsewhere (I'm not sure how the univerity system works in the U.S.A.), remember it's better to wait a year and lower your risk of being raped (not saying it won't happen but why go to somewhere where it seems quite likely as the offenders know they won't be punished?) than to go to a university this year and get raped and not even get justice.

Another university to avoid for similar reasons is UVA (University of Virginia) - details at this link: http://www.uvavictimsofrape.com/. The UVA website is http://www.virginia.edu/ and I have put the university websites so you know which ones I'm talking about.

What the heck is it with U.S. universities? I can't remember the name of it but I think there was another one that I read about too - similar stuff. Seems they care more about their image than helping students - even though them not helping students will negatively affect their image.

Also remember that in the U.S.A., universities count as "schools", and U.S. courts have consistently made it clear that schools can blatantly ignore th U.S. constitution. I bet their ancestors would be outraged if still alive.